<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do higher efficiency gas boilers cost more for repair parts and do they have more parts?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boiler-scrappage.info/do-higher-efficiency-gas-boilers-cost-more-for-repair-parts-and-do-they-have-more-parts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boiler-scrappage.info/do-higher-efficiency-gas-boilers-cost-more-for-repair-parts-and-do-they-have-more-parts/</link>
	<description>Replace Your Inefficient Boiler</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 17:12:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Van  Mcmanus</title>
		<link>http://www.boiler-scrappage.info/do-higher-efficiency-gas-boilers-cost-more-for-repair-parts-and-do-they-have-more-parts/comment-page-1/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>Van  Mcmanus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 17:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boiler-scrappage.info/do-higher-efficiency-gas-boilers-cost-more-for-repair-parts-and-do-they-have-more-parts/#comment-51</guid>
		<description>Yes, more parts and some are electronic which are pricey. Gas valves are pricey but that sounds a bit high to me by at least $100 for only a valve. Maybe that included a servicing too. 

Generally I doubt the higher efficiency for a gas boiler will pay off all that much. I usually tend towards saying if it is working then leave it.

 If it was much older than your 40 years it might be worth it. I would guess you are closer to 80% efficient at that age, that generation of units. Older ones can be 60%-65%.  To get to 90+ they add a lot of stuff that cost more, like a draft inducer fans and sensors for it and intermittent ignition. They do require more service.  Then you only gain like 10% or 15% max. for the investment.

But payoff time is directly proportional to the cost of the gas.

Unless you intend to stay in the house for many many years it probably won&#039;t pay off. And investing the money from the purchase cost would generate enough income to cover the cost of the slightly lower efficiency, imo. 

Good Luck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, more parts and some are electronic which are pricey. Gas valves are pricey but that sounds a bit high to me by at least $100 for only a valve. Maybe that included a servicing too. </p>
<p>Generally I doubt the higher efficiency for a gas boiler will pay off all that much. I usually tend towards saying if it is working then leave it.</p>
<p> If it was much older than your 40 years it might be worth it. I would guess you are closer to 80% efficient at that age, that generation of units. Older ones can be 60%-65%.  To get to 90+ they add a lot of stuff that cost more, like a draft inducer fans and sensors for it and intermittent ignition. They do require more service.  Then you only gain like 10% or 15% max. for the investment.</p>
<p>But payoff time is directly proportional to the cost of the gas.</p>
<p>Unless you intend to stay in the house for many many years it probably won&#8217;t pay off. And investing the money from the purchase cost would generate enough income to cover the cost of the slightly lower efficiency, imo. </p>
<p>Good Luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

